Starting out

Pick it once and keep it everywhere

An alias that differs by one letter across platforms is an alias doing half its job.

By Updated 4 min readStarting out

Guides on Starting out: A rubric is a production tool before it is a quality claim, The brief is rarely the request, Getting the first booking, in order

Set up a working alias by choosing a short, pronounceable name, reserving it in identical form everywhere at once, and giving it its own email and logins. A working name has two jobs: it separates this work from the rest of your life, and it accumulates.

The second job fails silently if the name is not identical everywhere, because a review history spread across three near-identical handles is three histories of no consequence. Spend twenty minutes choosing it and you will not touch the decision again.

What makes a name work

Pronounceable, because buyers say it in reviews and mistype it in searches. Spellable from hearing it once, which rules out deliberate misspellings and number substitutions. Short enough to survive a platform's character limit without being truncated into something else.

Not a phrase describing the service. A name that reads as a category rather than a person competes with every other listing using the same words, and it cannot follow you if you change what you sell.

Avoid anything that is already a trademark, a public figure, or an existing handle with a following in an adjacent market. If the alias doubles as a trading name, formal rules apply too: GOV.UK's guidance for UK sole traders rules out "Ltd" or "plc", offensive names, and names too like an existing trademark, and asks for your own name alongside the business name on paperwork such as invoices. That last point is worth knowing before you promise yourself total separation, and other countries have their own versions. The check takes two minutes: search the name in quotes, then search it on the marketplaces you plan to use plus the two or three social platforms you do not plan to use but might.

Register or reserve it in all of those places at once, including the ones you have no intention of using. The cost is zero and the alternative is discovering in month six that the name you have built reviews under belongs to someone else on the platform you now want to expand to.

The one-character problem

Handles drift because platforms force them to. One service will not allow underscores, one strips capitals, one has your first choice already taken so you add a digit.

Every one of those is a small permanent tax. Buyers who look for you elsewhere fail to find you, referrals go nowhere, and the consistency that makes a working name read as a real professional is gone.

The fix is to choose a name that survives every character rule you can anticipate: letters only, no spaces, no punctuation, lowercase, and available in that exact form on all of them before you commit. If it is taken on one, pick a different name rather than accepting a variant. Consistency across platforms is worth more than any individual name you might be attached to.

Keeping it separate

The alias is only a separation if nothing joins it to you.

A dedicated email address, created fresh, used for nothing else, not a plus-address on your personal account. No reuse of a password, a recovery phone number or a security question answer that appears anywhere in your personal accounts. No signing in with a personal social login, which is the single most common way the two sides get linked.

Watch the incidental leaks: a display name that autofills from a device, a profile picture reused from an old account, a timezone or a language setting, a document filename with your real name in it that ships with a delivered report. The filename one catches people who did everything else right.

How far to take this depends on which position you have chosen on disclosure, and that is a decision worth making deliberately rather than by accident - the trade-off between anonymity and a name sets out the increments and what each buys.

When it changes

Rarely, and expensively. A name change costs you your accumulated reviews on any platform that does not carry them across, plus every buyer who was going to come back and could not find you.

The two cases that justify it: a legal conflict, or a name that turns out to be linkable to you. Neither is a branding decision.

If you do change, run both names in parallel wherever the platform allows it, and say plainly in your listing that you were previously the other one. Reputation that survives a rename is reputation you built in public, which is also what makes it survive a platform closing or changing its rules.

What the name has to carry

None of this matters much on day one and all of it matters by month six, which is the awkward shape of the decision.

The demand side treats a consistent, findable name as evidence of seriousness in exactly the way you would hope: how buyers approach choosing someone to commission shows they are mostly filtering for signs that a person is real and will still be there next month. The same reasoning applies to what a search for that name turns up - the tools and directories that aggregate this market are frequently where a buyer lands first, and a name that resolves cleanly there is doing work you are not present for. Handling of your details behind the scenes is a separate matter and documented on the systems side.

Marketplaces vary in whether a display name can be changed at all, how often, and whether reviews follow it. The Rate Cock judges page states what a listing name there is and is not, and it is the sort of constraint worth reading before you pick the name rather than after you have twenty reviews under it.

Read next

Full archive