Starting out
Early is the cheapest goodwill available
Turnaround is the one dimension a buyer can evaluate objectively, and it shows up in reviews.
Guides on Starting out: A rubric is a production tool before it is a quality claim, The brief is rarely the request, Getting the first booking, in order
A buyer cannot tell whether your assessment was better than the next person's. They can tell, without any expertise at all, whether it arrived before you said it would.
That asymmetry is why turnaround is mentioned in reviews out of all proportion to how much it costs you to control.
The mechanism is slack, not speed
Delivering early is not a matter of working faster. It is a matter of quoting a turnaround with a margin already inside it, and then working at your normal pace.
Time one complete job honestly, end to end, including the brief and the admin. Take your realistic completion time and quote roughly double it. If a job takes you four hours of elapsed attention and you can reliably start within a day, quote 48 hours and deliver in 24. Doubling sounds excessive until you look at how people estimate: in Buehler, Griffin and Ross (1994), students predicted a large task would take 33.9 days, took 55.5, and fewer than half finished even by their own worst-case estimate.
The slack is not padding your listing to look slow. Quoting 48 when the market band is 48 costs you nothing and gives you a free win on every job; quoting 12 to look fast means every ordinary interruption turns an ordinary week into a late delivery, and one late delivery costs more than a dozen fast ones earn.
What early delivery actually buys
Three things, in ascending order of value.
It removes the buyer's anxiety, which is the state most first-time buyers are in between payment and delivery, and it removes it before they think to message you.
It gives you room to be wrong about your own capacity. Illness, a job that turns out harder than it looked, a submission that arrives at midnight - all of these are absorbed silently instead of becoming a conversation.
And it compounds. Repeat buyers book the person they do not have to chase, and the reason has nothing to do with the work: a reliable supplier is one fewer thing to manage. That is the same effect that shows up in what brings repeat buyers back, where predictability outranks almost everything except not being unpleasant.
Where it stops paying
Early is a floor effect, not a scale. Delivering in one hour rather than six does not buy six times the goodwill, and it creates an expectation you then have to meet forever.
There is also a plausibility limit. An assessment returned twenty minutes after payment reads as something that did not involve looking properly, whatever the truth is. Below a certain elapsed time you are undermining the perceived care rather than demonstrating speed.
And urgency that a buyer specifically requested is a priced product rather than a courtesy - the case for charging for it is in what urgency is actually worth, and giving it away free removes a tier you could have sold.
The one rule that matters
Never quote a turnaround you have not already hit twice.
Everything else here is optimisation. This one is the difference between early delivery as a habit and early delivery as a thing you promised and now have to defend.
Buyers describe waiting as the worst part of commissioning someone, and their own account of how a commission normally runs is mostly a description of uncertainty about timing. Part of the pressure comes from what they are used to: the automated tools that return a score immediately have set the baseline expectation, and what an instant machine score is actually doing explains why a human turnaround needs to be stated rather than assumed.
Platform turnaround fields and what happens when one lapses are documented on Rate Cock's judges page, and the penalty for a missed one is worth reading before you set yours.